Rivista n. 28


L’azione affettivamente determinata. Sentimentalismo e intellettualismo degli attori sociali

by Angelo Zotti

This article focus on Max Weber and T. Parsons’s affective action, i.e. actions which are taken due to ‘one’s emotions, to express personal feelings. The Author is particularly interested in two fundamental elements of this type of action, sentimentalism and intellectualism as two tendencies of human behaviour that are not opposed to each other. Sentimentalism is the tendency to base actions and reactions from feelings and to investe emotions in the social object (other persons, material things, social situations). These practices result in growing adaptive capacity of individuals. Intellectualism, along with egocentric attitude in individuals, produces a culture of victimism and, in the Author’s view, is referred to ideologism and tendency to polemic.

L’intento di questo breve articolo è analizzare il modello di azione sociale che M. Weber codificò come “azione affettivamente determinata” e T. Parsons definì “espressiva“, mettendone in evidenza i due fondamentali elementi che sembrerebbero caratterizzarla: l’elemento sentimentale e quello intellettuale. Il “sentimentalismo” viene qui inteso come tendenza manifesta del soggetto agente a investire l’oggetto sociale della sua affettività e\o emotività.

Si ritiene che prassi di questo tipo generino una maggiore propensione degli individui ad adattarsi con successo alle condizioni imposte dall’ambiente esterno. Con il termine “intellettualismo” si allude, invece, all’importanza che, nella definizione di particolari modalità comportamentali, finiscono per assumere fattori e motivi razionali: un’attività del pensiero particolarmente accentuata che indurrebbe i soggetti a valutare il mondo esterno in maniera autoriferita e quindi poco obiettiva.

La «seconda modernità». Cenni introduttivi alla sociologia di Ulrich Beck

by Antonio Camorrino

Ulrich Beck argues, in most of his works, that theoretical tools of modern sociology can not explain the complex and unprecedented transformations taking place in «late modernity».Events that threaten the life of contemporary man can not be understood using modern concepts cause each of these reveal a discrepancy between the language and reality, a discrepancy that Beck calls “world risk society”. The global extent of the side effects of humanaction – typical of late modernity – goes beyond the possibility of complete control: today we live in an ambivalent era because, on the one hand humans have to face seemingly insurmountable challenges, on the other hand, just the size of this huge crisis, establishing the conditions for a social renewal.

Ulrich Beck sostiene, praticamente nella quasi totalità dei suoi lavori, che l’attrezzatura teoricatrasmessaci dalla sociologia classica non consente di interpretare efficacemente le complesse e inedite trasformazioni oggi in atto: gli originali eventi che attentano alla vita dell’uomo contemporaneo non si lasciano penetrare dalla dotazione concettuale moderna e rivelano tutti una discrepanza tra la lingua e la realtà, una discrepanza che Beck chiama “società mondiale del rischio”.

L’estensione globale degli effetti collaterali dell‟azione umana – tipica della tardo-modernità – trascende la realistica possibilità del loro controllo: si apre quindi una stagione dai tratti ambivalenti giacché, se da un lato i consorzi umani devono fronteggiare sfide all‟apparenza insormontabili, dall’altro, proprio la dimensione di tale crisi epocale, istituisce un regime inedito e potenzialmente fecondo per una salutare ristrutturazione delle forme di organizzazione della vita umana.

Dalla sfera pubblica razionale alla sfera pubblica emotiva

by Diego Lazzarich

This article proposes a critical analysis of Habermas’ category of “public sphere”, showing how the public sphere has been historically used as an instrument of domination and not just as a space for rational deliberation. The article further looks into how the public sphere is changing with the irruption of the Internet, proposing the category of emotional public sphere to describe the impact of the Web on the political transformations brought about by the Arab Springs in 2011.

Il presente articolo si propone di operare un’analisi criticare della categoria di Habermas di “sfera pubblica”, nel tentativo di mostrare come la sfera pubblica sia stata usata storicamente anche come strumento di dominio e non solo come spazio per una deliberazione razionale. Ci si interroga, poi, sul come stia cambiando la sfera pubblica con l’irruzione di Internet, proponendo la categoria di sfera pubblica emotiva per descrivere l’influenza della Rete nei cambiamenti politici avvenuti nel 2011 con le Primavere Arabe

Rivista Italiana di Conflittologia n. 28 scarica pdf

23 Commenti

  1. I’m not sure where you are getting your information, but good topic. I needs to spend some time learning more or understanding more. Thanks for wonderful info I was looking for this information for my mission.|

  2. You actually make it appear so easy with your presentation but I in finding this matter to be actually one thing that I feel I would never understand. It seems too complicated and very vast for me. I am having a look forward in your next publish, I’ll attempt to get the grasp of it!|

  3. Hi exceptional website! Does running a blog like this require a large amount of work? I have very little understanding of computer programming however I was hoping to start my own blog in the near future. Anyway, if you have any suggestions or tips for new blog owners please share. I understand this is off subject but I just needed to ask. Many thanks!|

  4. Nice blog! Is your theme custom made or did you download it from somewhere? A design like yours with a few simple tweeks would really make my blog shine. Please let me know where you got your theme. Bless you|

  5. Hi, Neat post. There is a problem with your web site in internet explorer, could test this? IE still is the marketplace chief and a huge part of people will pass over your fantastic writing due to this problem.|

  6. Heya this is kind of of off topic but I was wanting to know if blogs use WYSIWYG editors or if you have to manually code with HTML. I’m starting a blog soon but have no coding experience so I wanted to get advice from someone with experience. Any help would be enormously appreciated!|

  7. That is really attention-grabbing, You are an excessively skilled blogger. I have joined your feed and look forward to in quest of more of your excellent post. Also, I have shared your website in my social networks|

  8. I think that what you typed was very reasonable. But, think about this, suppose you were to write a awesome post title? I am not saying your information isn’t good., but what if you added something that grabbed a person’s attention? I mean BLOG_TITLE is a little boring. You ought to glance at Yahoo’s front page and see how they create post titles to get viewers to click. You might add a related video or a related picture or two to grab people interested about what you’ve got to say. Just my opinion, it might bring your blog a little livelier.|

  9. I’m not that much of a online reader to be honest but your blogs really nice, keep it up! I’ll go ahead and bookmark your website to come back later. All the best|

  10. I am really enjoying the theme/design of your website. Do you ever run into any web browser compatibility problems? A small number of my blog audience have complained about my site not operating correctly in Explorer but looks great in Chrome. Do you have any advice to help fix this issue?|

  11. Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as though you relied on the video to make your point. You obviously know what youre talking about, why waste your intelligence on just posting videos to your weblog when you could be giving us something informative to read?|


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here